Asset Investment Planning & Management

July 8, 2015 Copperleaf Marketing

Energy Electrical Guest Editorial CoverIn a world of aging assets and limited financial and human resources, companies often struggle to decide which asset-related capital projects should get the most attention. Managers are required to compare vastly diverging project justifications and must somehow decide which projects bring the most value to the organization. The new ISO 55000 international asset management standard clarifies some of the principles, but doesn’t help you select or apply a methodology. This article explores how combining asset failure risk evaluations with a well-defined corporate value function can lead to optimal decision making.

This article was featured in the May/June 2015 issue of Electric Energy T&D magazine.

 

About the Author

Copperleaf provides decision analytics to companies managing critical infrastructure. Headquartered in Vancouver, our solutions are distributed and supported by regional staff and partners worldwide.

Follow on Linkedin More Content by Copperleaf Marketing
Previous Article
Copperleaf Sponsors the IAM Subject Specific Guidelines for Asset Management
Copperleaf Sponsors the IAM Subject Specific Guidelines for Asset Management

As an active member of the IAM, Copperleaf is pleased to be able to sponsor these documents and support the...

Next Article
Guest Post: Criticality Analysis and Making Better Decisions
Guest Post: Criticality Analysis and Making Better Decisions

A criticality analysis is a way to determine which systems and assets are most essential, in order to set p...